This section reacts towards the concern ” What maybe you have discovered?” thus, just results that are representative your quest must certanly be presented. The outcomes must be needed for conversation.

This section reacts towards the concern ” What maybe you have discovered?” thus, just results that are representative your quest must certanly be presented. The outcomes must be needed for conversation.

Statistical guidelines

  • Indicate the analytical tests used in combination with all appropriate parameters: e.g., suggest and standard deviation (SD): 44% (±3); median and interpercentile range: 7 years (4.5 to 9.5 years).
  • Use mean and deviation that is standard report usually distributed data.
  • Utilize median and interpercentile range to report skewed information.
  • For figures, utilize two significant digits unless more accuracy is important (2.08, maybe maybe not 2.07856444).
  • Never ever utilize percentages for really tiny examples e.g., “one away from two” shouldn’t be changed by 50%.

However, understand that most journals provide the probability of including Supporting Materials, therefore utilize them easily for information of additional value. This way, don’t make an effort to “hide” information into the hope of saving it for a paper that is later. You might lose evidence to bolster your summary. If information are way too numerous, you should use those materials that are supplementary.

Utilize sub-headings to help keep outcomes of the type that is same, that is simpler to review and read. Quantity these sub-sections for the ease of internal cross-referencing, but constantly taking into consideration the publisher’s Guide for Authors.

When it comes to data, determine an order that is logical tells a definite tale and causes it to be and simple to comprehend. Generally speaking, this is within the exact same purchase as presented within the practices part.

A significant problem is that you shouldn’t add recommendations in this area; you’re presenting your outcomes, so that you cannot make reference to other people right here. In the event that you relate to other people, is basically because you may be talking about your outcomes, and also this needs to be within the Discussion area.divider|Because you may be talking about your outcomes, and this should be within the Discussion part.divider if you relate to other people, is

Write the Discussion

Right right right Here you need to answer exactly just exactly what the total outcomes suggest. Most likely it’s the simplest area to create, nevertheless the most difficult part to have appropriate. This is basically because it will be the many crucial element of your article. Right Here the chance is got by you to offer your computer data. Remember the fact that a giant amounts of manuscripts are refused since the Discussion is poor.

You will need to result in the Discussion corresponding towards the outcomes, but don’t reiterate the outcome. Right right Here you will need to compare the posted outcomes by the peers with yours (using a number of the sources contained in the Introduction). Never ever ignore work with disagreement that you are correct or better with yours, in turn, you must confront it and convince the reader.

Consider the following tips:

1. Prevent statements that exceed just what the outcomes can help.

2. Avoid expressions that are unspecific as “higher temperature”, “at a lower life expectancy rate”, “highly significant”. Quantitative explanations will always preferred (35єC, 0.5%, p reduce individual communications, try not to add unpublished findings, manuscripts submitted although not yet accepted for book, magazines that aren’t peer evaluated, grey literature, or articles not posted in English.

When I have mentioned, you’ll find probably the most authoritative information for every single journal’s policy on citations whenever you consult the log’s Guide for Authors. As a whole, you ought to reduce individual communications, and start to become mindful on how you consist of unpublished findings. These is supposed to be required for some procedures, but think about if they strengthen or weaken your paper. You may additionally think about articles posted on research systems ahead of book, but consider balancing these citations with citations of peer-reviewed research. Whenever research that is citing languages apart from English, know about the chance that not everybody when you look at the review procedure will talk the language regarding the cited paper and therefore it may possibly be beneficial to find a interpretation where feasible.

Any software can be used by you, such as for instance EndNote or Mendeley, to format you need to include your sources into the paper. Many journals have the chance to install little files with the structure associated with recommendations, enabling you to change it out immediately. Additionally, Elsevier’s Your Paper your path system waves strict formatting demands for the original distribution of the manuscript so long as it includes most of the crucial elements being presented right right right here.

Result in the guide list plus the in-text citation conform strictly towards the design offered into the Guide for Authors. Keep in mind that presentation associated with recommendations when you look at the correct structure is the obligation regarding the writer, perhaps maybe perhaps not the editor. Checking the structure is generally a job that is large the editors. Make their work easier plus they will appreciate the effort.

Finally, always check the immediate following:

  • Spelling of writer names
  • 12 months of magazines
  • Usages of “et al.”
  • Punctuation
  • Whether all sources are included

In my own next article, i shall offer methods for writing the manuscript, authorship, and just how to publish a cover letter that is compelling. Stay tuned!divider

Recommendations and Acknowledgements

This paper has been based by me regarding the materials distributed towards the attendees of numerous courses. It really is prompted by numerous Guides for Authors of Elsevier journals. A number of this given info is additionally showcased in Elsevier’s Publishing Connect tutorials. In addition, We have consulted a few web pages:,

I wish to acknowledge Dr. Christiane Barranguet, Executive discount Publisher of Aquatic Sciences at Elsevier, on her constant help. And I also want to thank Dr. Alison Bert, Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Connect; without her support, this show might have been impractical to complete.

Related Tales

In this brand new series — “How to get ready a Manuscript for Overseas Journals” — a practiced editor offers advice to improve your odds of acceptance

Students writes in regards to the motivation behind his model for earthquake prediction – and exactly exactly what he discovered on their (“tedious but worth it”) journey to book

Whatever they don’t always inform you before you subscribe for graduate college

The research that is ideal you envision just isn’t exactly just exactly what it looks

Journal editors expose the very best reasons a manuscript gets posted

Tips for Authors through the Publishing Connect Training Webcasts Channel

A log editor reveals the very best reasons many manuscripts don’t allow it to be to the peer review process

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *